A contempt of court case which had already been resolved as per directions from the Kerala High Court in a writ petition regarding an employee provident fund matter. The matter was closed.
Contempt of court case closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
FRIDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 13TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942
Con.Case(C).No.1089 OF 2019 IN WP(C). 38662/2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 26.2.2019 IN WP(C) 38662/2018(G) OF
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS 2ND, 3RD AND 5TH:
1 P.B.PRADEEP KUMAR
AGED 60 YEARS, S/O.S.BHASKARAN, PULLATTUKUZHI, MYTHRI LANE, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM, P.F.A/C/ NO.KR/KCH/0013212/000/0000080, P.P.O.NO.KR/KCH/00100863.
2 JONY ISAAC AGED 60 YEARS, S/O.ISAAC WILSON, THOTTATHIL HOUSE, MADAPPALLY P.O., CHANGANASSERY, ERNAKULAM, P.F.A/C NO.KR/KCH/0013212/000/0000075, P.P.O.NO.KR/KCH/00099322.
3 PADMAKUMARI. S. AGED 64 YEARS D/O. LATE. DAMODARAN NAIR.P., 'KEERTHI' PRRA, 194, TRIVENI NAGAR, THIRUVANKULAM P.O., ERNAKULAM, P.F.A/C/ NO.KR/KCH/0013212/000/0000027, P.P.O.NO.KR/KCH/00075728.
BY ADV. SRI.P.N.MOHANAN RESPONDENT/3RD RESPONDENT:
B.ANDREW PRABHU
AGED 50 YEARS
S/O. S. BHAKTHAVALSALAM (LATE), ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION (EPFO), SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, “BHAVISHYANITHI BHAVAN”, KALOOR, KOCHI - 682 017, RESIDING AT KADAVANTHARA, KOCHI.
R1 BY ADV. SMT.NITA.N.S.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.12.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
C.O.(C) No.1089/2019
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 4th day of December 2020
A.M.Shaffique, J.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent that the directions issued by this Court had been complied with subject to the result of the pending matters before the Apex Court.
Having regard to the factual situation, nothing further survives to be decided in the matter. Accordingly, the Contempt
Case is closed.
Sd/-
A.M.SHAFFIQUE JUDGE
Sd/- GOPINATH.P. JUDGE
csl
3
C.O.(C) No.1089/2019
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 A true copy of the judgment dated 26-02-2019 in WPC No.38662/2018
P.B. Pradeep Kumar and others
B. Andrew Prabu
A.M. Shaffique
Gopinath P.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
