K.M.Ajith Kumar v. B.Andrew Prabhu
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court closed the contempt petition as no further issues remained after the respondent filed a compliance report subject to pending Apex Court matters.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
FRIDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 13TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942
Con.Case(C).No.1038 OF 2019 IN WP(C). 31/2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 12.10.2018 IN WP(C) 31/2017(D) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
K.M.AJITH KUMAR AGED 59 YEARS, S/O.BALRAM.K.M., GEETHAM, BMC NAGAR, IRIMPANAM, THRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM - 682 309, P.F.A/C.NO.KR/KCH/0013212/000/0000124, P.P.O.NO.KR/KCH/00093994.
BY ADV. SRI.P.N.MOHANAN
RESPONDENT/3RD RESPONDENT:
B.ANDREW PRABHU AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.S.BHAKTHAVALSALAM (LATE), REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION (EPFO), SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, “BHAVISHYANITHI BHAVAN”, KALOOR, KOCHI - 682017, RESIDING AT KADAVANTHARA, KOCHI.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.M. Ajith Kumar
- respondent
B. Andrew Prabh
Coram
A.M. Shauffique
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court