In a contempt petition arising from a pension matter, the court accepted that prior directions had been complied with subject to further Apex Court orders. The court held no further directions were needed and dropped the contempt case.
The contempt case is dropped; no further directions are required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
THURSDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942
Con.Case(C).No.49 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 28125/2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 28125/2016(M) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 12/10/2018
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS 19 & 21:
1 A.ABRAHIM
AGED 63 YEARS S/O ALIKUTTY, CHARUVILAPUTHEN VEEDU, CHELAPPALLY, KARUKONE P.O., ANCHAL, KOLLAM-691 306, PF NO.KR/KTM/10048/136, P.P.O.NO.KR/KLM/95801
2 K.C.UNNIKRISHNAN, AGED 66 YEARS S/O.K.A CHELLAPPAN, KRISHNAVIHAR, VAKKAM,MUKKU,ALAYAMON P.O., ANCHAL, KOLLAM-691 306, PF NO.KR/KTM/10048/28, P.P.O.NO.KR/KLM/79389
BY ADV. SRI.P.N.MOHANAN
RESPONDENT/THIRD RESPONDENT:
SANDEEP BISWAS (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, ADITYA SABARI TOWER, POST OFFICE ROAD, THIRUNNAKKARA, KOTTAYAM-686 001, RESIDING AT KOTTAYAM
BY ADV.SMT.NITA N.S. SC, EPF
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.12.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Cont.Case (C) No.49/2020
-:2:-
J U D G M E N T
Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2020
Shaffique, J.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent
that the directions issued by this Court had already been complied with. However, learned counsel submits that the compliance is subject to further orders to be passed by the Apex Court.
No further directions are required in the matter. The contempt case is hence dropped.
Sd/-
A.M.SHAFFIQUE
JUDGE
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
kp
True copy
JUDGE
P.A. To Judge
Cont.Case (C) No.49/2020
-:3:-
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE-A1 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 12.10.2018 IN W.P(C) NO.28125/2016 ANNEXURE-A2 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 01.04.2019 IN SLP NO.9610/2019 ANNEXURE-A3 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 24.06.2019 OF THE RESPONDENT ANNEXURE-A4 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 16.07.2019 OF THE EMPLOYER ANNEXURE-A5 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 29.08.2019 OF THE RESPONDENT ANNEXURE-A6 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NIL DATED OF THE RESPONDENT
A.Abrahim
K.C.Unnikrishnan
Sandeep Biswas
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation
A.M. Shaffique
Gopinath P.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
