Trichur Cans and Components(Pvt)Ltd, v. M/S.Contach
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 13TH PHALGUNA, 1941
AS.No.270 OF 2000(D)
OS 293/1994 OF I ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, THRISSUR
APPELLANT/DEFENDANT
TRICHUR CANS AND COMPONENTS(PVT)LTD, III/412, 46, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, PERINGANDOOR.P.O., VIA. MULANGUNNATHUKAVU, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, T.K.DAYANANDAN.
BY ADVS. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF
M/S.CONTACH, BUSINESS CONSULTANTS, 35/1296, II FLOOR, PALLIMUKKU, M.G.ROAD, COCHIN 682016, REPRESENTED BY PROPRIETOR PRAKASH VASUDEVAN, S/O.K.V.VASUDEVAN.
THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03.03.2020, ALONG WITH AS.271/2000(E), THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
A.S.270 & 271 of 2000
2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 13TH PHALGUNA, 1941
AS.No.271 OF 2000
OS 1303/1993 OF I ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, THRISSUR
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF
CANS AND COMBONENTS PVT.LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR DAYANANDAN, THRISSUR
BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU (SR.)
RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT
PRAKASH VASUDEVAN, CHIT CONSULTANT, CONTACH MAYFLOWER, KASARBA LANE , THRISSUR 7, PRESENT ADDRESS - XXXVI/1296, II FLOOR, PALLIMUKKU, M.G.ROAD, COCHIN
THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03.03.2020, ALONG WITH AS.270/2000(D), THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
A.S.270 & 271 of 2000
3
JUDGMENT
Dated : 3rd March, 2020
When this matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that to his information, the appellant Company is no longer in existence and may have been liquidated and that he is unable to obtain instructions from his client.
In the afore circumstances, I am of the view that the appellant is no longer interested in prosecuting this Appeal and consequently this Appeal will stand dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN Judge
Mrcs/3.3.
TRICHUR CANS AND COMPONENTS(PVT)LTD
M/S.CONTACH, BUSINESS CONSULTANTS
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court