The petitioner withdrew the writ petition seeking mandamus to number a residential building and finalize revenue proceedings. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition with all questions left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
TUESDAY ,THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1940
WP(C).No. 806 of 2019
PETITIONER:
MADHUSOODHANA PANICKER O.S, AGED 62 YEARS
S/O. SREEDHARA PANICKER, PERUMPALLATHU OMANALAYAM, VALANJAVATTOM EAST P.O, THIRUVALLA 689 104.
BY ADVS. SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND SMT.V.P.SHEEJA
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR COLLECTORATE, PATHANAMTHITTA 689 645.
3 THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, KADAPRA, NIRANOM P.O 689 621.
4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE VILALGE OFFICER, KADAPRA 689 621.
6 THE SECRETARY, KADAPRA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KADAPRA, NIRANOM P.O, THIRUVALLA 689 621.
BY ADVS. SRI.T.P.PRADEEP SRI.S.SREEDEV SRI P M MANOJ, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.02.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 806 of 2019
2
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:
counsel for petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission granted and the writ petition is
WP(C).No. 806 of 2019 3
dismissed as withdrawn. All questions of facts and law raised in the writ petition are left open, if required to be agitated before an appropriate Forum.
SMV 26.2.2019
Sd/-
SHAJI P.CHALY
JUDGE
Madhusoodhana Panicker O.S
The District Collector
The Revenue Divisional Officer
The Agricultural Officer
The Village Officer
The Kadapra Grama Panchayat
Shaji P.Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
