Petitioner filed a contempt case alleging non-compliance with earlier directions in a writ petition. It is reported that the petitioner submitted the directions were complied with, leading the court to close the contempt case on that ground without further proceedings or findings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
TUESDAY ,THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1940 Con.Case(C).No. 244 of 2019 IN WP(C). 36951/2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 36951/2018 of HIGHCOURT
PETITIONER:
BABY RAMACHANDRAN, AGED 71 YEARS W/O.LATE RAMACHANDRAN, MATTAKKAL HOUSE, AYYAMPILLY.P.O, VYPINKARA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682501.
BY ADV. SRI.M.M.MONAYE
RESPONDENT:
T.K.JOSE, I.A.S., (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
BY ADV.
SRI P M MANOJ SR GP
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.02.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
Con.Case(C).No.244/2019 IN WP(C).36951/2018
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed by the petitioner complaining that directions contained in the judgment in W.P.(C).No.36951/2018 dated 19.11.2018 are not complied with.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, already the directions are complied with. Therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue the contempt case any further. Hence the contempt case is closed accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P.CHALY
JUDGE
VPK
3
Con.Case(C).No.244/2019 IN WP(C).36951/2018
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19/11/2018 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP(C)36951/2018. ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 30/11/2018 SENT TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE A3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 30/11/2018.
// TRUE COPY//
PA TO JUDGE
VPK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to continue the contempt proceedings given that the petitioner claimed compliance with previous directions.
BABY RAMACHANDRAN
T.K.JOSE
SHAJI P.CHALY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
