In this writ petition, the court disposed of the matter by directing the First Respondent to consider and pass orders on the Petitioner's revision petition after an opportunity of hearing to all parties within three months.
Directed the First Respondent to consider and pass orders on the Petitioner's revision petition after hearing, within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 30TH JYAISHTA, 1941
WP(C).No.16812 of 2019
PETITIONER:
BIBINA.V.ANTONY, AGED 30 YEARS WIFE OF ATHEESH CHUMMAR, LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, N.S.V.V.L.P.SCHOOL, KANNIKULANGARA, P.O.PUTHENCHIRA, MALA, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT ANNEX-II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2 THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.B.UNNIKRISHNA KAIMAL ,GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20.06.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.16812 of 2019
2
J U D G M E N T
Petitioner, who was appointed as an LPST as per Ext.P1 order on 01.06.2015 in the 6th respondent School, is aggrieved by the denial of approval to her appointment. Petitioner has submitted Ext.P6 revision petition aggrieved by Ext.P4 order.
The writ petition is therefore disposed of, directing the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 revision petition, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and 6th respondent, within a period of 'three months' from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment.
Sd/- P.V.ASHA, JUDGE.
AS
WP(C).No.16812 of 2019
3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 01.06.2015.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE G.O. (P)NO.256/11/G.EDN. DATED 28.12.2011 OF THE GOVERNMENT.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 01.06.2017. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.C/1390/2019/K.DIS DATED 04.03.2019 OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE THE DIRECTOR BY THE MANAGER DATED 23.07.2018.
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT BY THE PETITIONER DATED 03.06.2019.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the directive to the first respondent to consider the petitioner's revision petition affording an opportunity of hearing within three months is appropriate.
Bibina.V.Antony
The State of Kerala
The Director of Public Instruction
The Deputy Director of Education
The District Educational Officer
The Manager, N.S.V.V.L.P. School
P.V.Asha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
