The plaintiffs came up with this appeal against the concurrent findings rendered by the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court rejecting the grant of a permanent prohibitory injunction sought in the suit against the second defendant. The subject matter of the suit comes to one acre 32 cents and the house therein. According to the plaintiffs, it was obtained under kanam kuzhikanam assignment deed of the year 1942, produced and marked as Ext.A1. Subsequently, the suit was amended by incorporating a prayer for declaration that the second defendant has no title over the property and also for recovery of possession of the property. But, no relief was sought for declaring the alleged title of the plaintiffs over the property in the suit. The Survey Commission visited the property and prepared Ext.C1 report and Ext.C2 plan locating the plaint schedule property. Two other reports were also submitted locating the very same property. In all these three reports, the plaint schedule property is located out of the property comprised in Sy.No.15/1. As per the plaint schedule, the eastern property belonged to one Ahammed Haji. That was also located by the Commissioner out of the
