Second appeal filed against decree and judgment of Additional Sub Court and Additional Muniff Court dismissed by this Court for non-prosecution as appellants and their counsel were absent while respondents' counsel appeared.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
TUESDAY ,THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1941
RSA.No. 1134 of 2004
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT IN AS 69/2001 of ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, ALAPPUZHA DATED 24-03-2004
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT IN OS 468/1999 of ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT, ALAPPUZHA DATED 31-10-2000
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS 1 TO 4:
4 NIYAMON (MINOR) REPRESENTED BY THE 2ND APPELLANT UMAIBA BEEVI.
BY ADVS.
SRI.M.V.MATHEW SRI.LOUIS JOHN PEREKATT
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF 1 TO 4:
1 RUKHIYA BEEVI, W/O ABUBAKER ANTHIL HOUSE, PUNNAPRA MURI, PUNNAPRA VILLAGE,, ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADVS. SMT.BHAVANA VELAYUDHAN SRI.S.SANAL KUMAR
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
R.S.A.No.1134/2004
2
JUDGMENT
Appellants and counsel remained absent. Nobody represented the matter. Last time also, the counsel was not ready for argument and this case was adjourned to today by ordering last chance. The learned counsel for the respondents is ready for argument. As such this court has no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for nonprosecution. The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN
JUDGE
sv
UMAIBA BEEVI
ABDUL KHADER
SHANIMOL ANCHIL VEEDU
NIYAMON
RUKHIYA BEEVI
SAJUMON
P.SOMARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
