Kali v. Paru
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court dismissed a regular second appeal as it was barred by limitation, noting that the condonation of delay in the CM Application was rejected.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal was dismissed as barred by limitation.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
TUESDAY ,THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1941
RSA.No. 387 of 2004
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT IN AS 33/1996 of SUB COURT, TIRUR DATED 21-03-2003
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT IN OS 241/1992 of MUNSIFF COURT, TIRUR DATED 31-10-1995
APPELLANT/APPELLANT IN A.S./PLAINTIFF IN O.S.:
KALI
VAKKATTU PURAKKAL, TIRUNAVAYA, TIRUR TALUK,, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.T.KRISHNANUNNI (SR.)
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN A.S./DEFENDANTS IN O.S.:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal was barred by limitation.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
KALI VAKKATTU PURAKKAL
- respondent
PARU
- respondent
KUNHUNNI
- respondent
KUNHI
- respondent
JANAKI
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court