Lilly v. Santhosh
Case brief
What is this about?
The regular second appeal filed by Lilly was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant and counsel were absent on the third posting of the matter.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
FRIDAY ,THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 1ST CHAITHRA, 1941
RSA.No. 471 of 2005
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23-12-2004 IN AS 319/2001 of III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT (ADHOC), FAST TRACK NO.1 COURT, THRISSUR
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17-07-2001 IN OS 1968/1997 of III ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT,THRISSUR
APPELLANT/2ND RESPONDENT/2ND DEFENDANT:
LILLY, AGED 46, W/O. MAPRANAM PAUL, RESIDING AT VADAKKEVETTU-, VAZHIYIL ANGADI, ARANATUKARA VILLAGE,, THRISSUR TALUK.
BY ADVS.
SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.GINESH.P.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Lilly
- respondent
Santhosh
- respondent
Sumukhan
- respondent
Damodharan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court