Rajamma v. Sivasankaran
Case brief
What is this about?
A regular second appeal was finally heard on 23.07.2019. Counsel for the appellants submitted there was no instruction from the appellants. The Court dismissed both appeals exclusively for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JULY 2019 / 1ST SRAVANA, 1941
RSA.No.300 of 2009 (B)
AGAINST THE DECREE & JUDGMENT DATED 20-09-2008 IN AS No. 54/2006 of SUB COURT, PALA
AGAINST THE DECREE & JUDGMENT DATED 20-01-2006 IN OS No.121/2001 of MUNSIF COURT, KANJIRAPPALLY
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/ADDL.9th DEFENDANT:
BALAKRISHNAN, AGED 62 YEARS, KOCHALAKAL (PUTHEN VEETTIL) HOUSE, MURIKKUMVAYAL BHAGOM, ERUMELY NORTH VILLAGE, MURIKKUMVAYAL KARA, KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.M.NARENDRA KUMAR
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS 1 AND 2 AND DEFENDANTS 1 AND 3 TO 10:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
BALAKRISHNAN
- respondent
K.K.SIVASANKARAN
- respondent
THANKAMMA
- appellant
RAJAMMA
- respondent
SIVASANKARAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court