Sreekrishnan v. Chamy
Case brief
What is this about?
In RSA No.203/2010, the Kerala High Court held that an appeal against a partition suit decree was abated due to non-prosecution. The court also observed that the appeal abated regarding the deceased third respondent.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JULY 2019 / 1ST SRAVANA, 1941
RSA.No.203 of 2010 (G)
AGAINST THE DECREE & JUDGMENT DATED 30-06-2009 IN AS No.65/2005 of ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, ADHOC - III, PALAKKAD
AGAINST THE DECREE & JUDGMENT DATED 10.12.2004 IN OS No.132/1993 of MUNSIFF COURT, CHITTUR
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
SREEKRISHNAN, S/o ARU, PARAKATHU CHALLA, PATTANCHERRY VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.DILIP SRI.SAJU.S.A
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SREEKRISHNAN
- respondent
CHAMY
- respondent
MAYAN
- respondent
RAJAMANI
- respondent
SREEKRISHNAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court