Sreenivasan v. Mami
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular second appeals were dismissed as the appellants failed to appear and no instructions were received from the concerned party on the date of hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2019 / 31ST ASHADHA, 1941
RSA.No.381 of 2004 (D)
AGAINST THE DECREE & JUDGMENT DATED 13-08-2003 IN AS No.36/1997 of ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, IRINJALAKUDA
AGAINST THE DECREE & JUDGMENT DATED 14-11-1996 IN OS No.298/1995 of MUNSIFF COURT, KODUNGALLUR
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS:
- 1 SREENIVASAN, S/o THARAYIL VELAYUDHAN, KAIPAMANGALAM VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK.
- 2 SUGATHAN, S/o THARAYIL VELAYUDHAN, KAIPAMANGALAM VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK.
- 3 RENUKA, D/o THARAYIL VELAYUDHAN, KAIPAMANGALAM VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SREENIVASAN, S/o THARAYIL VELAYUDHAN
- appellant
SUGATHAN, S/o THARAYIL VELAYUDHAN
- appellant
RENUKA, D/o THARAYIL VELAYUDHAN
- appellant
USHA, D/o THARAYIL VELAYUDHAN
- appellant
NARAYANI, MOTHER OF APPELLANTS 1 TO 4
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court