Daniel Podiyan v. Antony
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed a regular second appeal as abated after the learned counsel submitted that the sole appellant died without impleading his heirs due to a returned notice. The court accepted this submission.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed as abated.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2019 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1941
RSA.No. 2 of 2004 (A)
AGAINST THE DECREE & JUDGMENT DATED 24-10-2002 IN AS No.29/1999 of II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, KOLLAM,
AGAINST THE DECREE & JUDGMENT DATED 22.09.1998 IN OS No.291/1994 of MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE COURT, SASTHAMCOTTA
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
DANIEL PODIYAN, CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, IVERKALA PADINJATTEKARA NORTH MURI, KUNNATHOOR VILLAGE.
BY ADV. SRI.K.SASIKUMAR
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS 1 & 2:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal lies after the death of the sole appellant without impleading his heirs.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
DANIEL PODIYAN
- respondent
ANTONY
- respondent
KUNJAMMA PONNAMMA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court