Thomas v. Clara
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular second appeal filed in 2004 was heard on May 27, 2019. The court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution as appellants remained absent despite notice.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2019 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1941
RSA.No. 1082 of 2004
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT IN AS 306/2001 of III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT (ADHOC) FAST TRACK COURT I, THRISSUR DATED 26-06-2004
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT IN OS 2615/1998 of III ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT,THRISSUR DATED 30-06-2001
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS:
- 1 THOMAS, AGED 69 YEARS S/O CHIRAYATH ANTHANIKKAL POULOSE, PONALLOOR DESOM, MANALOOR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.
- 2 CHANDRAN, AGED 69 YEARS S/O.THURUTHIYIL SANKARAN, PONALLOOR DESOM, MANALOOR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.
3 KOCHAPPANA AGED 60 YEARS S/O.CHIRAYATH THARAYIL KUNJIPPALU, PONALLOOR, DESOM, MANALOOR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK(DIED).
Parties & counsel
- appellant
1. THOMAS
- appellant
2. CHANDRAN
- appellant
4. PHILOMINA
- appellant
5. LEENA
- appellant
6. LINSON
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court