Perumal v. Jayaraman
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MAY 2019 / 7TH JYAISHTA, 1941
RSA.No. 1227 of 2005
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10-03-2005 IN AS 28/2002 of SUB COURT,KATTAPPANA
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10-04-2002 IN OS 143/1997 of MUNSIFF COURT, DEVIKULAM
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
PERUMAL, S/O ARUMUGHAM, AGED 65 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, PAZHATHOTTAM KARA,
VATTAVADA VILLAGE,
(CHITTUVARAI ESTATE FACTORY DIVISION).
BY ADVS.
SRI.JOICE GEORGE SRI.A.G.TISSARANT
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
1 JAYARAMAN, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O.THANKASWAMY THEVAR, AGRICULTURIST, PAZHANTHOTTAM KARA, VATTAVIDA VILLAGE,
DEVIKULAM TALUK.
S/O.NALLAKANNU THEVAN, AGRICULTURIST, PAZHATHOTTAM KARA, VATTAVIDA VILLAGE, DEVIKULAM TALUK.
4 MURUGAN, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O.CHITHAMBARAM, AGRICULTURIST, PAZHATHOTTAM KRA, VATTAVIDA VILLAGE, DEVIKULAM TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28.05.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RSA.No. 1227 of 2005 2
JUDGMENT
The counsel for the appellant fairly submitted that the sole appellant passed away. No application was submitted for impleading his legal heirs. Nobody come forward in that behalf and hence appeal stood as abated.
The appeal is dismissed as abated.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN
JUDGE
msp
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
PERUMAL
JAYARAMAN
PARAMESWARAN
CHELLADORAI
MURUGAN
P. SOMARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court