Allowed

T.H.Musthaffa v. the Assistant Registrar of Co-Operative Societies(General)

Kerala HC6 Aug 2019RP/194/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this review petition, the High Court modified the impugned judgment dated 20.04.2018 to specify that all questions of law and facts raised in the underlying writ petition are left open, as the previous order had directed the petitioner to consider a filed appeal without explicitly closing the writ petition issues.

What did the court decide?

The judgment dated 20.04.2018 is modified to specify that all questions of law and facts raised in the writ petition are left open.

T.H.Musthaffa Vs the Assistant Registrar of… — Company and Corporate | Kerala HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 06TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019 / 15TH SRAVANA, 1941

¶5

RP.No.194 OF 2019 IN WP(C). 14142/2018

¶6

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 14142/2018(P) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA

¶7

REVIEW PETITIONER/S:

¶8

T.H.MUSTHAFFA AGED 76 YEARS S/O.T.K.M.HYDROSE, BISMILLAH MANZIL, THOTATHIL KOTTAPURATH, CHALAKKAL, MARAMPALLY.P.O, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

¶9

BY ADVS.

¶10

SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR SRI.ARJUN RAGHAVAN

¶11

RESPONDENT/S:

¶12

1 THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(GENERAL) ALUVA, ERNAKULAM-683101.

¶13

2 THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(GENERAL) ERNAKULAM-682030.

¶14

3 THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

¶15

4 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, CO-OPERATION (C)DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

¶16

R1 TO R4 SRI.MOHAMMED HASHIM.K.S,SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER

¶17

THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.08.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

RP.No.194 OF 2019 IN WP(C). 14142/2018 2

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

This Review Petition is filed by the petitioner

¶21

seeking to review the judgment dated 20.04.2018, basically on the ground that, when the writ petition

¶22

was disposed of directing to consider the appeal filed by the petitioner, the questions raised in the

¶23

writ petition were not left open.

¶24

petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, the judgment specified above is modified to the extent that all the questions of law and facts raised in

¶25

the writ petition are left open.

¶26

The Review Petition is allowed to the above

¶27

extent.

¶28

Sd/-

¶29

SHAJI P.CHALY JUDGE

¶30

hmh

¶31

RP.No.194 OF 2019 IN WP(C). 14142/2018 3

¶32

APPENDIX

¶33

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶34

ANNEXURE I TRUE COPY OF THE AWARD IN THE LOK ADALATH DATED 14/07/2018 IN S.T.NO.5807/2015 ALONG WITH COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 16/07/2018.

¶35

ANNEXURE II TRUE COPY OF THE AWARD IN THE LOK ADALATH DATED 14/07/2018 IN S.T.NO.10/2016 ALONG WITH COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 16/07/2018.

¶36

ANNEXURE III TRUE COPY OF THE AWARD IN THE LOK ADALATH DATED 14/07/2018 IN S.T.NO.25/2016 ALONG WITH COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 16/07/2018.

¶37

ANNEXURE IV TRUE COPY OF THE AWARD IN THE LOK ADALATH DATED 14/07/2018 IN S.T.NO.26/2016 ALONG WITH COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 16/07/2018.

¶38

RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS:NIL

T.H.Musthaffa v. the Assistant Registrar of Co-Operative Societies(General)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.H.Musthaffa v. the Assistant Registrar of Co-Operative Societies(General)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

St.Alphonsa Transport, Vs Chief Transport Manager(Retail)South

Vadakkan Roadways, Vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

Julie Jaya Vs the Commissioner of Entrance Examinations

K.M.Michael Vs Government of Kerala

P.Shanavas, Vs Kerala Khadi and Village Industries Board

Roopam Constructions, Vs the Chief Engineer