Dismissed

Rajan K.Nair v. Francis O.M.

Kerala HC11 Jun 2019Con.Case(C)/85/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed contempt proceedings alleging non-compliance with directives in a judgment dated 01-11-2018. Counsel for the petitioner stated that the directives had been complied with. The court accepted this submission and closed the contempt case without further proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Closed the contempt of court case as the petitioner submitted that the directives were complied with.

Rajan K.Nair Vs Francis O.M. — Contempt of Court | Kerala HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 21ST JYAISHTA, 1941 Con.Case(C).No. 85 of 2019 IN WP(C). 35694/2018

¶5

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 35694/2018 of HIGHCOURT

¶6

PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

¶7

RAJAN K.NAIR AGED 52 YEARS S/O.KRISHNAN, KALPURATH HOUSE, ATTATHARA, KUNDANNUR P.O., WADAKKANCHERY VIA, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680590.

¶8

BY ADVS. SRI.C.A.CHACKO SMT.C.M.CHARISMA SMT.MEGHA K.XAVIER

¶9

RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT:

¶10

FRANCIS O.M.,

¶11

(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), SECRETARY, ERUMAPPETTY GRAMA PANCHAYAT, ERUMAPPETTY, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680584.

¶12

BY ADVS. SRI.SANTHOSH P.PODUVAL SMT.R.RAJITHA

¶13

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11.06.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

Con.Case(C).No. 85 of 2019 IN WP(C). 35694/2018

¶15

¶16

JUDGMENT

¶17

This Contempt of Court Case is filed by the petitioner complaining that the directives contained in the judgment dated 01-11-2018, is not complied with.

¶18

Today when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the directives are complied with. Therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue the contempt of court proceedings any further.

¶19

The Contempt of Court Case is closed, accordingly.

Sd/-

SHAJI P.CHALY

JUDGE

KAS

Con.Case(C).No. 85 of 2019 IN WP(C). 35694/2018

¶25

¶26

APPENDIX

¶27

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶28

ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 1.11.2018 IN W.P.(C) NO.35694 OF 2018 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

¶29

RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶30

ANNEXURE R1(a) TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT PAGE OF ASSET REGISTER OF THE PANCHAYAT

¶31

ANNEXURE R1(b) TRUE COPY OF REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE WARD CLERK BEFORE THE PANCHAYAT ANNEXURE R1(c) TRUE COPY OF DECISION No.24/1 OF THE PANCHAYAT COMMITTEE DATED 07-01-2019 ANNEXURE R1(d) TRUE COPY OF DECISION No.15/1 DATED 27-09-2018 OF THE PANCHAYAT COMMITTEE

¶32

//TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE

Rajan K.Nair v. Francis O.M.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajan K.Nair v. Francis O.M.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Capt.Satheesh Kumar.K.a Vs Government of India

Anjali K.S., Vs the Central Board of Secondary Education

Kadeeja.M Vs Commissioner of Civil Supplies

Kala Raju Vs the Cathaloic Syrian Bank

P.Anilkumar Vs the State of Kerala

Joji Joseph, Vs the Superintending Engineer