Premarajan.a.P v. Sriram Sambasiva Rao
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt case, the court noted that the District Collector had heard the petitioner and rejected his request via an order dated 07.02.2019. Finding that directions were complied with belatedly, the court closed the case but preserved the petitioner's right to challenge the impugned orders.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed; liberty reserved to challenge orders passed by statutory authorities.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY ,THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 29TH MAGHA, 1940 Con.Case(C).No. 35 of 2019 IN WP(C). 23673/2018
PETITIONER/S:
PREMARAJAN.A.P AGED 42 YEARS
S/O.KUNHIKANNAN, VADAKKETHURUTHIYIL HOUSE, PALAYAD NADA, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.BABU S. NAIR SMT.SMITHA BABU
RESPONDENT/S:
1 SRIRAM SAMBASIVA RAO AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOZHIKODE, PIN-673001.
2 MANOJ KUMAR.K AGED AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, MANIYOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MANIYOOR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN-673523.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt proceedings should continue given that the authorities had already considered the petitioner's request and passed an order rejecting it.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
PREMARAJAN.A.P
- respondent
SRIRAM SAMBASIVA RAO
- respondent
MANOJ KUMAR.K
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court