Jyothi T v. Smt. Mini
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt case closed as appointment of most petitioners was approved by respondent; remaining petitioners allowed to challenge consequential orders.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed with liberty to petitioners to challenge consequential order if aggrieved.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY ,THE 04TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 15TH MAGHA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 2501 of 2018 IN WP(C). 39385/2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 39385/2016 of HIGHCOURT
PETITIONER/S:
1 JYOTHI T AGED 46 YEARS W/O. BAIJU, K.A., UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT RAMAKRISHNA MISSION HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
2 LATHA K.T.P., AGED 53 YEARS
W/O. DR.K. MADAVAN, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT RAMAKRISHNA MISSION HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
3 RANJITH RAJ K.G., AGED 38 YEARS S/O. RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT RAMAKRISHNA MISSION HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JYOTHI T AGED 46 YEARS W/O. BAIJU
- petitioner
LATHA K.T.P.
- respondent
SMT. MINI
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court