In a bail application regarding offences under sections 406 and 420 IPC, the court observed that the serious nature of the allegations and the close transaction between parties made it an inappropriate case for bail, leading to dismissal of the application.
Bail application dismissed; petitioner to be continued in custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
WEDNESDAY,THE 06TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 17TH MAGHA, 1940
Bail Appl..No. 197 of 2019
CRIME NO. 13/2019 OF Harbour Police Station , Ernakulam
PETITIONER/S:
NAZIR
AGED 46 YEARS S/O. MUHAMMED KUNJU, KOLASERIL PUTHEN VEEDU, PADAM NORTH, KARUNAGAPPALLY.
BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SASITH
RESPONDENT/S:
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682 031.
2 THE SUB INSPECTOR HARBOUR POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
OTHER PRESENT:
SR.PP C.N PRABHAKARAN
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.02.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
BA No. 197/2019
2
O R D E R
Petitioner herein stands arrayed as 3rd accused in Crime No.13/2019 of Harbour police station for offences punishable under sections 406 & 420 IPC.
Considering the serious nature of allegation, I do not feel that this is a fit case for granting the bail to the petitioner. Hence, bail application is dismissed.
Sd/-
SUNIL THOMAS
JUDGE
dpk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application of the petitioner accused in a cheating case under IPC sections 406 and 420 should be allowed.
Nazir
State of Kerala
The Sub Inspector Harbour Police Station
Sunil Thomas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
