Raj Mohanan P.v., v. Executive Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
An auto-rickshaw driver sought to contribute to the Kshemanidhi scheme beyond age 50 to secure benefits. The court dismissed the petition, directing the petitioner to approach the Government to seek the merger of schemes for allowing continued contributions.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of leaving it open for petitioner to approach Government for seeking merger of schemes.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
FRIDAY ,THE 07TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2018 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA, 1940
WP(C).No. 36613 of 2018
PETITIONER/S:
RAJ MOHANAN P.V., AGED 63 YEARS S/O KUNHIRAMAN, RESIDING AT NIRMALYAM, P.O. KIZHUNNA, KANNUR DIST.- 670 007.
BY ADV. SRI.C.K.SREEJITH
RESPONDENT/S:
1 EXECUTIVE OFFICER KANNUR DISTRICT(HQ), KERALA STATE MOTOR THOZHILALI KSHEMANIDHI BOARD, KANNUR- 670 001 (KERALA MOTOR TRANSPORT WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD).
- 2 THE SECRETARY, KERALA MOTOR TRANSPORT WORKER'S WELFARE FUND BOARD, KOLLAM - 691001.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the petitioner to contribute to the Kshemanidhi scheme beyond the age of 50 when the scheme is unavailable for new entrants.
Whether the petitioner's grievance regarding scheme benefits should be directed towards the Government to seek merger of schemes.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAJ MOHANAN P.V.
- respondent
EXECUTIVE OFFICER KANNUR DISTRICT
- respondent
THE SECRETARY, KERALA MOTOR TRANSPORT WORKER'S WELFARE FUND BOARD, KOLLAM
- respondent
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MOTOR VEHICLE DEPARTMENT
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court