Disposed

P.R. Sasidharan v. the Managing Director

Kerala HC12 Sept 2018WP(C)/27520/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner complained that his salary is not paid via e-payment unlike other employees. The Court closed the petition, directing the respondent to take necessary action if a request for e-payment is made, finding no need for positive direction after the last month's payment was received as per the reply.

What did the court decide?

Petition closed; respondent directed to take necessary action if a request for e-payment is made.

P.R. Sasidharan Vs the Managing Director — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Kerala HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

¶4

WEDNESDAY,THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2018 / 21ST BHADRA, 1940

¶5

WP(C).No. 27520 of 2018

¶6

PETITIONER/S:

¶7

P.R. SASIDHARAN AGED 54 YEARS

¶8

S/O.V.K. RAGHAVAN, SASHI BHAVAN, KARAKKAD P.O., CHENGANNUR TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT

¶9

BY ADV. K.V. ANIL KUMAR

¶10

RESPONDENT/S:

¶11

1 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR HANDICRAFTS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF KERALA LIMITED, PUTHENCHANTHAI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, POST BOX NO. 171

¶12

2 THE ASSISTANT ACCOUNTS OFFICER HANDICRAFTS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF KERALA LIMITED, PUTHENCHANTHAI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, POST BOX NO. 171

¶13

BY ADV. SMT.LATHA ANAND, SC, HDCK LTD.

¶14

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.09.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

WP(C).No. 27520 of 2018

¶16

¶17

JUDGMENT

¶18

The complaint of the petitioner is that payment of salary is not made by way of e-payment as in the case of other employees.

¶19

2. Even though the petitioner complains that he is not getting salary regularly, the learned counsel for the petitioner admitted that payment of salary for the last month was received on 10^th . The further complaint appears to be non payment of salary by way of e-payment on account of which he is not getting salary on the last day of month.

¶20

3. The learned counsel of the respondent submits that complaint will be looked into.

¶21

Accordingly this writ petition is closed. In case, there is any request for e-payment, the respondent shall take necessary action.

Sd/-

P.V.ASHA

JUDGE

WP(C).No. 27520 of 2018

¶27

¶28

APPENDIX

¶29

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶30

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 29/12/2017 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY STATEMENT DATED 26/03/2018 EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION DATED 17/12/2014 OF THE DIRECTOR BOARD MEETING OF THE CORPORATION EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 15/01/2018 OF ONE SRI. SARGADHARAN EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 09/02/2018 ISSUED BY THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, KERALA HANDICRAFTS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED

P.R. Sasidharan v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.R. Sasidharan v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Indian Maritime University Vs Cochin Port Trust

Syam Kumar.N. Vs Sree Thricherumanna Alias Kottiyoor Devaswom

Meena. E Vs the Registrar

The Manager, T.E.M.v.H.S.S., Mylode Vs Sreekala K.S.

Leema Das Vs K.F.C.

K.R.Viswanathan Vs Chief Security Commissioner