Sunitha v. Thanka
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of the second regular appeal on a compromise agreed upon by all parties, including the appellant, and recorded the compromises in the decree.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was disposed of in terms of the compromise signed by all parties.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 18TH MAGHA, 1939
RSA.No. 212 of 2004(A)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 24-03-2003 IN AS NO. 103/1998 of I
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT,PALAKKAD
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 24-06-1998 IN OS. NO.58/1992 of
MUNSIFF'S COURT, CHITTUR
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
SUNITHA, W/O.MURALI,AGED 29 YEARS,
RESIDING AT PERUMPALLAM,THATHAMANGALAM VILLAGE,
CHITTUR TALUK.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SunitHa
- respondent
Several Respondents
Coram
A. HARI PrasAd
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court