The Court dismissed the regular second appeal as abated on the ground that the appellant had died. Pending interlocutory applications were also dismissed.
Appeal dismissed as abated following appellant's death; interlocutory applications dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 17TH MAGHA, 1939
RSA.No. 1211 of 2014 IN CMCP. 46/2013
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 15.10.2009 IN AS 15/2008 of ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, THALASSERY
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 14.9.2017 IN OS 171/2004 of MUNSIFF COURT, THALASSERY
AGAINST THE ORDER IN CMCP 46/2013 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:-
M.M. MADHAVI, D/O.MANIKKAM, AGED 78 YEARS RESIDING IN MANNAMBATH MADAPPURAKKAL HOUSE, P.O.MAMBA, ANJARAKKANDI, KANNUR TALUK REP. BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER M.M.VIJAYAN, S/O.ACHUTHAN, AGED 61, VIJAYA BHAVAN, THALAMUNDA P.O., KOODALI, KANNUR - 670 592
BY ADV.SRI.P.SIVARAJ
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANT:-:
M.M. RAJALAKSHMI D/O.NARAYANI, PARAKKAL HOUSE, P.O.KANHIRODE, KANNUR, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT SREE LAKSHMI NIVAS, POOVATHUMTHARA, P.O.MOWANCHERRY, KANNUR - 670 613
BY ADVS. SRI.P.U.SHAILAJAN SRI.D.N,NISHANI
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-02-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
A. HARIPRASAD, J.
R.S.A.No.1211 of 2014
Dated this the 6th day of February, 2018
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant died and the appeal is abated. The appeal is dismissed as abated.
All pending interlocutory applications will stand dismissed.
SD/- A. HARIPRASAD JUDGE
JV
M.M. Madhavi
M.M. Rajalakshmi
A. Hariprasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
