In this regular second appeal, the High Court of Kerala dismissed the matter due to non-prosecution as no instructions were received from the appellants despite a registered notice.
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution and interlocutory applications were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 18TH MAGHA, 1939
RSA.No. 1217 of 2005 (C)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25-01-2005 IN AS NO.121/1999 of SUB COURT,NEYYATTINKARA
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23-12-1998 IN OS NO.532/1995 of PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT,NEYYATTINKARA
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS 2 TO 5 & 7 TO 13
BY ADVS.SRI.L.MOHANAN
SMT.LIGEY ANTONY
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS & 6TH DEFENDANT
RSA.No. 1217 of 2005
2
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-02-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
A.HARIPRASAD, J.
R.S.A. No.1217 of 2005
-------------------------------------Dated this the 7th day of February, 2018
JUDGMENT
Matter comes up in the defect list. Learned counsel submitted
that despite sending a registered notice, no instruction is received from the
appellants. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
All pending interlocutory applications will stand dismissed.
A. HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.
cks
Joseph Nadar Stephen
Swarnamma Silvi
A.Hariprasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
