C.M.Ouseph v. Sheeba
Case brief
What is this about?
This court disposed of a review petition by clarifying that the impugned judgment's observations would not untrammelledly influence the trial court's disposal of the underlying suit on merits.
What did the court decide?
Clarification issued that trial court to decide suit on merits untrammelled by observations; review petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1939
RP.No. 174 of 2018 IN FAO. 281/2016
-------------------------------------
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN FAO 281/2016 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 08-01-2018
REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS:
- 1 C.M.OUSEPH,
S/O. MATHAI, AGED 44 YEARS, CHERUTHURUTHI HOUSE, CHOWARA KARA P.O, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683101.
- 2 RIJO PAPPACHAN,
S/O. PAPPACHAN, THACHAPPILLY HOUSE, CHOWARA KARA P.O, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683101.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.Mouseph
- petitioner
Rijo Pappachan
- respondent
Sheeba
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court