K.G.Thomas v. E.a.Shaji
Case brief
What is this about?
In a regular first appeal concerning a compromise, the court disposed of the matter by recording the lawful compromise regarding the execution and registration of a sale deed and refunding the appeal court fee.
What did the court decide?
Execution and registration of the sale deed pursuant to the decree is recorded; court fee on appeal memorandum refunded to the appellant.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 11TH PHALGUNA, 1939
RFA.No. 750 of 2011
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.08.2011 IN OS 69/2007 OF SUB COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA
APPELLANT/1ST DEFENDANT
K.G.THOMAS, S/O VARGHESE VAIDYAN, KEEPPANASSERIL HOUSE, THRIKKALATHOOR KARA, MULAVOOR VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT
BY ADVS.SRI.THAMPAN THOMAS
SRI.B.V.JOY SANKAR
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF
E.A.SHAJI, S/O ABDUL RASHEED, EZHUTHANIKKATTU VEETTIL, PAIPRA KARA, MULAVOOR VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 686 673
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.G.THOMAS
- respondent
E.A.SHAJI
Coram
K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court