This regular first appeal, filed against a judgment and decree of an additionl subordinate judge court at Ernakulam, was settled at mediation. The High Court allowed the appeal in terms of a compromise agreement.
Appellant to receive Rs.7,00,000/- as full and final settlement; suit attachment vacated; court fees refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1939
RFA.No. 353 of 2011
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 15.12.2010 IN OS 488/2005 OF I ADDL. SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
JOSE MATHEW, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.K.V.MATHEW, KUREEKKAL HOUSE, VAZHAKKALA VILLAGE, THRIKKAKARA P.O., KOCHI-682 021.
BY ADV.SRI.P.VISWANATHAN
RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
1. SMT.AYSHA, AGED 55
2. SRI.V.A.JAFFAR,
3. SMT.V.A.ASHA, AGED 37,
R1-R3 BY ADV. SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY R1-R3 BY ADV. SMT.K.K.JYOTHILAKSHMY R1-R3 BY ADV. SRI.SANIL JOSE
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01-03-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
R.F.A. No. 353 of 2011
Dated this the 1st day of March, 2018
J U D G M E N T
The matter was settled at mediation. I have perused the
agreement. I am satisfied that the agreement is lawful.
The compromise is recorded.
In the result, this appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise as follows:
The court fees paid on the appeal memorandum shall be refunded to the appellant.
Sd/-
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE
bka/
JOSE MATHEW
SMT.AYSHA
SRI.V.A.JAFFAR
SMT.V.A.ASHA
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
