Jhanci Antony v. Vijayasankar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt case alleging non-compliance with water access directions in a writ petition, the Court found no specific instances of violation in the petitioner's representation and closed the proceeding without imposing punishment.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 15TH PHALGUNA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 363 of 2018
(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.42161/2017 DATED 29-12-2017) --------------
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WRIT PETITION
JHANCI ANTONY, AGED 53 YEARS, W/O.LATE ANTONY GEORGE, TICKNAR PETALS, FLAT NO.2 E, NETHAJI NAGAR, KADAVANTHARA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 020.
BY ADV.SRI.M.G.SREEJITH
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION:
VIJAYASANKAR, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, FATHER NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE RESPONDENT NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER, STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION, KADAVANTHRA, ERNAKULAM-682 029
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JHANCI ANTONY
- respondent
VIJAYASANKAR
Coram
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court