High Court at Ernakulam in Contempt Case No.324 of 2018 allowed the petitioner's contention regarding the order dated 12.03.2018. The court held the petitioner free to take appropriate legal action if aggrieved by that order.
Petitioner free to take appropriate legal action if aggrieved by the order dated 12.03.2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 324 of 2018
-------------------------OP 11071/2003 of THIS HON'BLE COURT
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WRIT PETITION
T.K. SUGATHAN,
AGED 69 YEARS, S/O. KRISHNANKUTTY, RTD. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, HIGHER GRADE, MECHANICHAL SUB DIVISION, KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, VELLANIKKARA, THRISSUR, RESIDING AT THRIPPAKKAL HOUSE, MANNUTHY P.O, THRISSUR-680 651
BY ADVS.SMT.SREEDEVI KYLASANATH SRI.ACHUTH KYLAS SRI.R.MAHESH MENON SRI.KDEAGO JOHN
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN WRIT PETITION:
1. TEEKA RAM MEENA, ( AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. DR.S.LEENA KUMARI, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), REGISTRAR, KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY OFFICE, VELLANIKKARA, THRISSUR.
BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BIJOY CHANDRAN BY SRI.ROBSON PAUL, SC,
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-03-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bp 16/3/2018
Con.Case(C).No. 324 of 2018 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
| ANNEXURE A1 |
TRUE COPY OF THE 11071/2003. |
JUDGEMENT DATED 19.9.2016 IN OP |
|---|---|---|
| ANNEXURE A2 |
TRUE COPY REPRESENTATION DA PETITIONER BEFORE |
OF THE SUPPLEMENTARY TED 21.12.2016 SUBMITTED BY 1ST RESPONDENT. |
| ANNEXURE A2(A) | TRUE COPY OF THE SUBMITTED BY PETI |
REPRESENTATION DATED 21.12.2016 TIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. |
| ANNEXURE A3 | TRUE COPY OF THE | LETTER DATED 14.03.2017. |
| ANNEXURE A4 |
TRUE COPY OF THE RESPONDENT. |
REMINDER DATED 05.02.2018 TO 1ST |
| ANNEXURE A4(A) | TRUE COPY OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. |
REMINDER DATED 05.02.2018 TO |
| RESPONDENT'S AN | NEXURES : | NIL. |
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
bp 16/3/2018
P.V.ASHA J.
Contempt Case (Civil) No.324 of 2018
--------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of March, 2018
J U D G M E N T
Learned Government Pleader made available a copy
of the order passed on 12.03.2018 pursuant to Annexure-A1 judgment. Petitioner will be free to take
appropriate legal action, in case, he is aggrieved.
Sd/-
P.V.ASHA, JUDGE.
AS
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner may be aggrieved by the order passed on 12.03.2018 and take appropriate legal action.
What is the relief available to the petitioner in the present contempt case.
T.K. Sugathan
Teeka Ram Meena
Dr.S.Leena Kumari
P.V.Asha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
