Contempt petitioner complained directions in judgment dated 24.10.2017 were not complied with. Court found directions complied belatedly based on respondent’s order. Contempt case closed without further proceedings.
None. Contempt case closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 3RD PHALGUNA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 2277 of 2017 IN WPC. 28710/2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 28710/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 24-10-2017
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN WPC NO. 28710/2017
RAJU M S/O MARIYAN, AGED 44 YEARS, KANDATHUCHIRAYIL VEEDU, KAVOOR P.O, PUNALOOR, KOLLAM. PIN-689 696.
BY ADV.SRI.S.NIDHEESH
RESPONDENT(S)/IN WPC NO. 28710/2017:
HEMACHANDRAN IPS
AGED AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRESENTLY WORKING AS MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, EAST FORT, TRIVANDRUM.
BY SHRI.T.P SAJAN, SC, KSRTC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-02-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 2277 of 2017 IN WPC. 28710/2017
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE 1: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.10.2017 IN WP(C) NO.28710/2017 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
dlk
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
C.O.(C) No. 2277 of 2017
Dated this the 22nd day of February, 2018
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed by the petitioner complaining
that the directives contained in the judgment dated 24.10.2017
is not complied with.
the respondent has produced before me an order dated 19.2.2018, from where I am satisfied that, the directions in the
judgment are complied with, though belatedly. Therefore, I do
not find any reason to pursue the contempt case any further.
Contempt case is closed, accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE
dlk/22/2/
RAJU M
HEMACHANDRAN
SHAJI P CHALY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
