Thankamma Sivaraman v. Binoy K.M
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court closed a contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a prior direction. As the respondents appealed the impugned judgment and the appeal remained pending, the Court deemed it unnecessary to decide the contempt case, granting liberty to file later after the appeal is disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner granted liberty to approach the Court after the pending appeal against the impugned judgment is disposed of.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 16TH PHALGUNA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 2224 of 2017
----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 28173/2010 DATED 16-11-2016
---------------
PETITIONER
THANKAMMA SIVARAMAN, THEKKEPATTU VEEDU, EDAYAR P.O. (VIA), KOOTHATTUKULAM-686662.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.B.HARI NARAYANAN SMT.SHAZIA BINT ASHRAF
RESPONDENT:
BINOY K.M., S/O.MATHACHAN, PRESIDENT, THE EDAYAR KSHEEROTHPATHAKA SAHAKARANA SANGHAM, NO.E251(D), APCOS, EDAYAR P.O., KOOTHATTUKULAM-686662.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to address a contempt of court case when the impugned judgment is under appeal and pending before a Division Bench.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Thankamma Sivaraman
- respondent
Binoy K.M.
Coram
Devan Ramachandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court