Harikumar v. Sri. Salim
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a High Court directive dated 10.10.2017. Upon production of an order dated 15.11.2017 showing compliance, the court closed the contempt proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed as directives were complied with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2018 / 20TH POUSHA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 2079 of 2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).32234/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 10-10-2017
PETITIONER/PETITIONER
HARIKUMAR, AGED 42, S/O. N. SUNDARESAN, NANEPLAZHIKAM, THEKKEVILA P.O., KOLLAM.
BY ADV.SRI.ARUN BABU
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT:
SRI. SALIM, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DTO, KOLLAM - 13.
R BY SHRI.T.P SAJAN, SC, KSRTC
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Harikumar
- respondent
Salim
Coram
Shaji P. Chaly
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court