P.v.Girijan v. v.a.Sheeja
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt case filed to challenge a judgment in WP(C) 25396/2017, counsel for both sides submitted that the directions in the impugned judgment have been complied with, leading the court to close the contempt proceedings on the same day of admission.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 30TH MAGHA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 184 of 2018 ---------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 25396/2017 DATED 1.08.2017
--------------
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER
1 P.V.GIRIJAN, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O. JANAKI AMMA, PATTIYATH HOUSE, SHASTHRI NAGAR, NADATHARA P.O, THRISSUR.
2 K. BALACHANDRAN, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. BHASKARAN, VADAKEKUNNATH HOUSE, P.O VALAPPAD, TRICHUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA SRI.BALU TOM
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.V. Girijan
- petitioner
K. Balachandran
- respondent
V.A. Sheeja
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court