In a bail application challenging an order under the Abkari Act, the High Court of Kerala rejected the plea for bail dismissing the application citing the prosecution allegation of complicity and identification at the spot.
Bail application failed and dismissed; petitioner denied bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
TUESDAY ,THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2018 / 20TH AGRAHAYANA, 1940
Bail Appl..No. 8161 of 2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CRMC 1551/2018 of D.C. & SESSIONS COURT,KOZHIKODE DATED 22-11-2018
(CRIME NO. 503/2018 OF CHEVAYUR POLICE STATION )
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
SHAJI,
AGED 49 YEARS
S/O IMBICHIKUNHAN, KAYAMBRATH MEETHAL HOUSE, CHELAVOOR, KOZHIKODE
BY ADVS. SRI.P.S.SREEDHARAN PILLAI SRI.ARJUN SREEDHAR
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT & STATE :
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.
OTHER PRESENT:
SR.PP C.N PRABHAKARAN
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.12.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
BA No.8161/2018
2
O R D E R
Petitioner herein is the accused in Crime No.503/2018 of Chevayur
police station for offences punishable under sections 8 and 55 (g) of Abkari Act.
BA No.8161/2018
3
In the light of the above materials, I feel that it may not be proper
to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, bail application fails and is
dismissed.
Sd/-
SUNIL THOMAS
JUDGE
dpk
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the accused charged under sections 8 and 55(g) of the Abkari Act.
Whether the apprehension of arrest and false implication warrant the granting of bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SHAJI
STATE OF KERALA
SUNIL THOMAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
