The writ petition was dismissed because the petitioner failed to pay the process fee within the time stipulated by the court after notice was issued, leading the judge to presume a lack of intent to prosecute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL 2017/17TH CHAITHRA, 1939
WP(C).No. 9249 of 2014 (E) ---------------------------
PETITIONER:
RADHAMANI P.R.
PUTHENPURACKAL HOUSE,ORULANTHANNI P.O, PINAVOORKUDY, KUTTAMPUZHA, KOTHAMANGALAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.DILIP
SRI.P.N.VIJAYAN NAIR
RESPONDENTS:
R6 BY ADV. SRI.LIJOY P.VARGHESE R3 BY ADV. SRI.V.M.SYAM KUMAR R3 BY ADV. SMT.KRIPA ELIZABETH MATHEWS R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.A.C.VIDHYA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-04-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Dama Seshadri Naidu, J.
------------------------------------------WPC No.9249 of 2014
Dated this the 7th day of April, 2017
JUDGMENT
None appears. The record reveals that this Court ordered
notice on 31.3.2014. To this day, the petitioner has not chosen to file any process fee. I presume that the petitioner does not intend to prosecute the matter. So, the Court dismisses the writ petition.
sd/- Dama Seshadri Naidu, Judge
css/
true copy
P.S.TO JUDGE
Radhamani P.R.
The District Collector, Civil Station, Kakkanad P.O, Kochi-33
Deputy Director of Panchayaths, Civil Station, Kakkanad P.O, Kochi-33
Kuttampuzha Grama Panchayath Represented by Secretary
Savitha Santhosh Parakulath
Gopan Nelliyankal
Dama Seshadri Naidu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
