The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite prior notice, leading the Court to presume lack of inclination to pursue the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL 2017/17TH CHAITHRA, 1939
WP(C).No. 1840 of 2011 (D)
PETITIONER:
LEELAMMA JOSEPH, W/O.JOSEPH,
AGED 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT THEKKEVEETTIL, BUNGLOW, KANNANKODU MURI, ADOOR TALUK,, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
BY ADV.SRI.K.K.SETHUKUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.A.C.VIDHYA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-04-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Dama Seshadri Naidu, J.
WPC No.1840 of 2011
Dated this the 7th day of April, 2017
JUDGMENT
None appears for the petitioner. Despite the fact that the writ petition belongs to the year 2011 and that well in advance this Court has notified that the matter would be taken up today, the petitioner has not chosen to appear before the Court to prosecute the case. This Court accordingly holds that the petitioner may not be inclined to pursue the writ petition. As a result, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-Dama Seshadri Naidu, Judge
css/
true copy
P.S.TO JUDGE
Leelamma Joseph
State of Kerala
Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture
District Collector, Kollam
Agricultural Officer
Shafood
Dama Seshadri Naidu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
