The High Court of Kerala held that the petitioners failed to file the process fee after notice was issued in 2013. The court concluded the petitioners were not inclined to pursue the case and dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL 2017/17TH CHAITHRA, 1939
WP(C).No. 29350 of 2013 (P)
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS:
BY ADVS.SMT.SUSAN MATHEW
SRI.P.PRAMEL
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
R2&3 BY ADV. SRI.K.P.VIJAYAN SC, THRISSUR CORPORATION R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.A.C.VIDHYA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-04-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Dama Seshadri Naidu, J.
------------------------------------------WPC No.29350 of 2013
Dated this the 7th day of April, 2017
JUDGMENT
None appears. The record reveals that this Court ordered notice on 29.11.2013. To this day, the petitioners have not chosen to file any process fee. This Court accordingly holds that the petitioners may not be inclined to pursue the writ petition. As a result, the Court dismisses the writ petition for non-prosecution.
Sd/- Dama Seshadri Naidu, Judge
css/ true copy
P.S.TO JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for lack of process fee and non-prosecution.
Whether the petitioners have chosen to pursue the writ petition after notice was issued.
Jayarajan
Sivadasan
The State of Kerala
The Trissur Municipal Corporation
Dama Seshadri Naidu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
