Julie v. Attingal Municipality
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Ernakulam dismissed the writ petition as it was not pressed by counsel for the petitioner despite currently being filed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/23RD AGRAHAYANA, 1939
WP(C).No. 30169 of 2015 (U)
PETITIONER:
JULIE, AGED 39, W/O.BIJU, S. V. SADANAM, KIZHUVILOM P. O., MAMAM, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.SHAJIN S.HAMEED
RESPONDENTS:
1. ATTINGAL MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPALITY OFFICE, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN CODE 695101.
2. VIJAYAN, S/O.VELAYUDHAN PILLAI, VADAKKATHIL VEEDU, KIZHUVIKOM P. O., MAMOM, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695104.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JULIE
- respondent
ATTINGAL MUNICIPALITY
- respondent
VIJAYAN
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court