A writ petition filed by petitioners against state government officials was abandoned by the counsel during hearing. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/22ND AGRAHAYANA, 1939
WP(C).No. 2310 of 2017 (K)
PETITIONER(S):
1. AMRUTHA KUMARI.I, MANASWINI, THENGAMAM P.O., SOORANAD, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT - 690 522.
2. MOHANKUMAR.J, MANASWINI, THENGAMOM P.O., SOORANAD, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT -690 522.
BY ADVS.SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE(PERUMPALLIKUTTIYIL) SRI.A.R.DILEEP SRI.MANU SEBASTIAN SRI.P.J.JOE PAUL
RESPONDENT(S):
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT IN THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2. AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, PATHANAMTHITTA - 688 001.
4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, ADOOR - 689 121.
5. TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, ADOOR - 689 121.
2/-
-2-
WP(C).No. 2310 of 2017 (K)
6. VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, PALLICKAL - 690 563.
7. LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE (LLMC), PALLICKAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY CONVENOR, AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, PALLICKAL, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-688 001.
R1 TO R7 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.PAUL VARGHESE
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-12-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
******************************************************************* Dated this the 13**th day of December, 2017
J U D G M E N T
It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners do not wish to pursue the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE
//TRUE COPY//
P.A.TO JUDGE
nkr/13.12.2017
Amrutha Kumari.I
Mohankumar.J
State of Kerala
A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
