Dismissed
Ambalathu Veettil Muhammed Ali v. the District Superintendent of Police
Kerala HCWP(C)/20347/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
SATURDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2017/25TH BHADRA, 1939
WP(C).No. 20347 of 2012 (P)
PETITIONER(S):
AMBALATHU VEETTIL MUHAMMED ALI,
SON OF HAMSA, AGED 42 YEARS, AMBALATHU VEETTIL HOUSE, PADINJARANGADI POST OFFICE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI, SRI.BENHUR JOSEPH MANAYANI, SRI.JEEVAN MATHEW MANAYANI.
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAKKAD-678 001.
2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OTTAPALAM CIRCLE, PALAKKAD-679 101.
3. CHACKO JAMES, SON OF CHACKO, JOHN VILLA, KATHIRACHIRA, PUNALUR, KOLLAM-691 305.
4. STATE POLICE CHIEF, POLICE HEADQUARTERS, TRIVANDRUM-695 001.
5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM-695 001.
6. THE HOME SECRETARY, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, UNION OF INDIA, NEW DELHI-110 001.
WP(C).No. 20347 of 2012 (P)
7. THE SECRETARY TO FOREIGN AFFAIRS, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI-110 001.
8. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO HOME, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI-110 001.
9. MINISTRY OF OVERSEAS INDIAN AFFAIRS, GOVT. OF INDIA, AKBAR BHAVAN, NEW DELHI - 110 021, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, NEW DELHI.
R1, R2, R4 & R5 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.B. VINOD. R3 BY ADV. SRI.K.G.SARATHKUMAR. R6 TO R8 & ADDL. R9 BY SRI.N. NAGARESH, ASST. S.G. OF INDIA.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-09-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J
W.P(C) No.20347 of 2012 P
Dated this the 16th day of September, 2017
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the respondent submits that
the proceedings have been dropped by the United Arab Emirates,
which was the cause of action for the above writ petition; and matter has become infructuous. Writ petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, Judge jma //true copy//
P.A to Judge
AMBALATHU VEETTIL MUHAMMED ALI
THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAKKAD
THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OTTAPALAM CIRCLE
CHACKO JAMES
STATE POLICE CHIEF
STATE OF KERALA
K. VINOD CHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court