Benny Augustine v. Ajesh
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt case challenging the Thodupuzha Municipality's failure to evict an encroachment, the court noted a stay on eviction notices granted in a parallel writ petition. Consequently, the court closed the contempt proceedings pending the result of the grievance regarding that stay.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed pending the result of W.P.(C) No.27858 of 2017 regarding stay on eviction notice.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2017/24TH BHADRA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 1266 of 2017 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 27705/2016 DATED 30-11-2016
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION:
BENNY AUGUSTINE., AGED 52, S/O. KURIAKOSE AUGUSTINE, MAMPLAL HOUSE, OLAMATAM KARA, THODUPUZHA - 685 584.
BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)
RESPONDENT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION:
AJESH.,
AGE, FATHER'S NAME AND OTHER DETAILS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,SECRETARY, THODUPUZHA MUNICIPALITY, THODUPUZHA PO - 685 584.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt case regarding non-eviction of encroachment should remain open or be closed pending another writ petition.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Benny Augustine
- respondent
Ajesh
- respondent
Thodupuzha Municipality
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court