The petitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. The court dismissed the petition on that ground without further adjudication or detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JULY 2017/21ST ASHADHA, 1939
WP(C).No. 11721 of 2017 (M)
PETITIONER(S):
HOPE PLANTATIONS GLENMARY ESTATE, PEERMADE, IDUKKI, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 31, B B D BAGH, HONG KONG HOUSE, KOLKATTA - 700 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHOTISED SINGNATORY, MR.SUBRAMANIAM
BY ADVS.SRI.V.B.HARI NARAYANAN SMT.SHAZIA BINT ASHRAF
RESPONDENT(S):
1. KERALA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION KESTON ROAD, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN: 695 003, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2. THE TAHSILDAR PEERMADU - 685 531
R1 BY SRI.P.U.SHAILAJAN, SC R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-07-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 11721 of 2017 (M)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 A COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 22/12/2005 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2 A COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 15/7/2014 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3 A COPY OF THE REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT DATED 7/3/2017 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT P4 A COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 21/3/2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P5 A COPY OF THE STATEMENT SHOWING THE BALANCE OUTSTANDING AS ON 15/11/2013 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL -----------------------
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
dlk
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
--------------------------------------------
W.P.(C).No.11721 of 2017
--------------------------------------------------------------Dated this the 12th day of July, 2017
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits
that the matter has become infructuous. In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- P.B.SURESH KUMAR JUDGE
rsr
HOPE PLANTATIONS GLENMARY ESTATE, PEERMADE, IDUKKI
KERALA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
THE TAHSILDAR PEERMADU
P.B.SURESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
