The High Court of Kerala closed the writ petition as infructuous after the respondent Bank's counsel submitted that the matter had been settled. No substantive legal principle was determined.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2017/21ST CHAITHRA, 1939
WP(C).No. 10572 of 2017 (V) ----------------------------
PETITIONERS:
1. HAFIZ MOHAMMED IBRAHIM AGED 53 YEARS, S/O.LATE ALAVIKUTTY, VADAYIL HOSUE, ADAKKAKUNDU P O, KALIKAVU AMSOM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-679328.
2. KUNHI BEEVI W/O.LATE ALAVIKUTTY, VADAYIL HOSUE, ADAKKAKUNDU P O, KALIKAVU AMSOM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-679328.
BY ADV. SRI.V.A.NAVAS
RESPONDENTS:
STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE WANDOR BRANCH, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, CHIEF MANAGER, (ADV)REGIONAL OFFICE-V, MALAPPURAM, SRI E.V.NANDAGOPALAN-679328.
BY ADVS. SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN (SR.) SRI.K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-04-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 10572 of 2017 (V)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 13(4) OF SARFAESI ACT
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMISSION ISSUED NOTICE TO THE PETITIONERS.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
JJJ
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
W.P.(C) No. 10572 of 2017 (V)
Dated: 11th April, 2017
J U D G M E N T
The learned Counsel for the respondent Bank submits that the matter has been settled. Hence, the writ petition is closed as infructuous.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE
//True Copy//
P.A. to Judge
jjj 11/4/17
Hafiz Mohammed Ibrahim
Kunhi Beevi
State Bank of Travancore Wandor Branch
K.Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
