Disposed

Mathews John v. Raja Chandran

Kerala HC4 Aug 2017Con.Case(C)/1221/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a contempt proceeding, the respondent Government Pleader submitted that the earlier judgment directions were complied with via an order dated 31.07.2017. The Court recorded this submission and closed the case without prejudice for future proceedings.

What did the court decide?

The contempt case is closed without prejudice to the petitioner's right to impugn the compliance order in appropriate proceedings.

Mathews John Vs Raja Chandran — Contempt of Court | Kerala HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2017/13TH SRAVANA, 1939

¶5

Con.Case(C).No. 1221 of 2017 (S)

¶6

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 5950/2017 DATED 27-02-2017

¶7

----------------

¶8

PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS 1 & 2 IN W.P.(C)::

¶9

1. MATHEWS JOHN, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O.P.K.JOHN, JOHN VILLA ATTATHARAYIL, KOZHENCHERRY VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

¶10

2. JEFF MAMBILLY AGED 33 YEARS, S/O.BABY MAMBILLY, MAMBILLY HOUSE, KARUKUTTY, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRRICT.

¶11

BY ADVS.SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN SMT.S.INDU

¶12

RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.2 IN W.P.(C):

¶13

RAJA CHANDRAN,

¶14

(AGE FATHERS'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

¶15

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI C.P PRADEEP

¶16

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-08-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶17

K.V.

¶18

Con.Case(C).No. 1221 of 2017 (S)

¶19

APPENDIX

¶20

PETITIONERS ANNEXURES:

¶21

ANNEXURE AS: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.2.2017 IN WPC NO 5950/2017 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

¶22

ANNEXURE B: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 13/4/2017 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS AND OTHERS BEFORE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, CHENGANNUR.

¶23

ANNEXURE C: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 25.4.2017 ISSUED BY THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER.

¶24

ANNEXURE D: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 26/4/2017 ADDRESSED TO THE RESPONDENT.

¶25

ANNEXURE E: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 11/6/2017 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS AND OTHERS BEFORE THE RESPONDENT.

¶26

ANNEXURE F: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO B3109/2017 DATED 28/6/2017 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT.

¶27

ANNECURE G: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 1/7/2017 SENT BY THE PETITIONERS AND TWO OTHERS TO THE RESPONDENT.

¶28

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS NIL

/TRUE COPY/

P.S.TO JUDGE

K.V.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

¶33

............................................................. Con.Case(C).No.1221 Of 2017 -(S) ............................................................. Dated this the 4^th day of August, 2017

¶34

J U D G M E N T

¶35

It is submitted by the learned Government Pleader, on instructions, that the directions in the judgment dated 27.02.2017 in W.P.(C).No.5950 of 2017 have been complied with, by passing an order dated 31.07.2017. This submission of the learned Government Pleader is recorded and the contempt of court case is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to impugn the said order in appropriate proceedings, if so advised.

¶36

Sd/-

¶37

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE

¶38

mns/04.08.17

¶39

//true copy//

¶40

P.A To Judge

Mathews John v. Raja Chandran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mathews John v. Raja Chandran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Koshy George Vs C.F.Robert

Kuttan Vs a.S.Anooja

R.Syamkumar Vs Mr.Muhammed Huwais

Pauly Francis M. Vs Anil P.B.

E.M.Nazeer Vs the State of Kerala

M/S.Rajan Jewellery and Diamonds India Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner