notwithstanding this agreement. There being default in repayment of loan by respondents 3 and 4, the Co-operative Bank initiated proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstructions of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short, 'SARFAESI Act'). The writ petitioner being in possession, challenged the same before the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge disposed of the writ proceedings granting certain instalments for liquidation of the loan by the writ petitioner, who was merely an occupier of the property and not its owner. Thereafter, it appears that, the writ petitioner filed a review petition making additional prayer and the said prayer having been disallowed, this appeal has been filed. The prayer made by the writ petitioner in the review petition was that the title document deposited by the 3rd respondent with the Co-operative Bank may not be returned to respondents 3 or 4 rather transmitted to the civil court to be kept sealed. At this stage, we may note that as the writ petitioner was continuing in possession, respondents 3 and 4 filed a suit before the Sub Court, Thiruvananthapuram being O.S.No.1215 of 2009 for recovery of possession on payment of `4,50,000/-, which had been paid by the writ petitioner. In the review petition as noticed above, the writ
