Dismissed

Shabilatha B.S v. Unnikulam Grama Panchayath

Kerala HC7 Apr 2017RP/344/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala dismissed a review petition seeking review of an order declining renewal of a brick-kiln licence. The Court held that no error exists on the face of the record to warrant review and clarified that the Petitioner is not disabled from approaching the Tribunal. This is a brief order with no cited precedents or detailed legal reasoning.

What did the court decide?

The Review Petition is dismissed.

Shabilatha B.S Vs Unnikulam Grama… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Kerala HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL 2017/17TH CHAITHRA, 1939

¶5

RP.No. 344 of 2017 () IN WA.2416/2016 ---------------------------------------

¶6

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WA 2416/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 14-12-2016

¶7

REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/APPELLANT:

¶8

SHABILATHA B.S

¶9

W/O. CHANDRASEKHARAN, AGED 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT "SREYAS", KARUMALA P.O, BALUSSERI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

¶10

BY ADVS.SRI.B.KRISHNAN SRI.P.K.RAMKUMAR

¶11

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

¶12

1. UNNIKULAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,P.O. UNNIKULAM, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 612.

¶13

2. T.C. BHASKARAN, AGED 62 YEARS, S/O. KUHIPERACHAN, RESIDING AT THEERTHAKUZHICHALIL HOUSE, KARUMALA P.O, BALUSSERI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 612.

¶14

3. P.K. SAJEEVAN, S/O. CHANGAROTTY, AGED 45 YEARS, THEERTHAKUZHICHALIL HOUSE, KARUMALA P.O, BALUSSERI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 612.

¶15

4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, P.O, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE - 673 001.

¶16

5. THE GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MININIG AND GEOLOGY, P.O. CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 001. R2-R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN R4 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.B.JAYASURYA R5 BY SRI.T.SHIHABUDHEEN

¶17

THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON

¶18

07-04-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

V.Chitambaresh & Sathish Ninan, JJ. ============================== Review Petition No.344 of 2017 in W.A No.2416 of 2016

¶20

==========================

¶21

Dated this the 7^th day of April, 2017

¶22

ORDER

¶23

Chitambaresh, J

¶24

Anything said in the judgment sought to be reviewed will not disable the review petitioner from moving the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions against

¶25

the order declining renewal of licence to run the brick-kiln if she is otherwise entitled.

¶26

There is however no error apparent on the face of the record warranting review of the judgment impugned.

¶27

The Review Petition is dismissed.

¶28

Sd/- V.Chitambaresh, Judge

¶29

Sd/- Sathish Ninan, Judge

¶30

vdv

¶31

//TRUE COPY//

¶32

P.A TO JUDGE

Shabilatha B.S v. Unnikulam Grama Panchayath

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shabilatha B.S v. Unnikulam Grama Panchayath

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Swami Vivekananda Medical Mission Vs Bahuleyan Charitable Foundation

Saju George Vs the State of Kerala

Ind Bank Housing Ltd. Vs D.Vincent

Y.Ahamedkutty Haji Vs the Kerala State Wakf Board

State Bank of Travancore Perumbavoor Vs M/S.Xl Engineers

M/S.Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Baltic Shipping Sankit