Review petition by Special Public Prosecutors dismissed by the High Court of Kerala affirming no error apparent on the face of the record regarding their appointment status under the POCSO Act.
Review petition dismissed as no error apparent on the face of the record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL 2017/15TH CHAITHRA, 1939
RP.No. 260 of 2017 () IN WA.2264/2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WA 2264/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 01-12-2016
REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 10:
1. SAJU GEORGE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT-I,
(SPECIAL COURT FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFICES ACT), MANJERI, MALAPPURAM.
2. SHIBU GEORGE
SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT-I, (SPECIAL COURT FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFICES ACT),KOZHIKODE.
3. M.J.JOHNSON
SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT-I,
(SPECIAL COURT FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFICES ACT), KANNUR.
4. PIOUS MATHEW SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT-I, (SPECIAL COURT FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFICES ACT),THRISSUR
5. N. GOPALAKRISHNAN
SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT-I,
(SPECIAL COURT FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFICES ACT), KOTTAYAM
6. SANTHOSH T.A SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT-I, (SPECIAL COURT FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFICES ACT), IDUKKI.
7. LATHA JAYARAJ SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT-I, (SPECIAL COURT FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFICES ACT), PALAKKAD.
RP.No. 260 of 2017 () IN WA.2264/2016
-2-
8. JOSEPH ZAKHARIAS
SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT-I, (SPECIAL COURT FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFICES ACT), KALPETTA, WAYANAD DISTRICT.
9. SHAJAHAN RAWTHER
SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT-I,
(SPECIAL COURT FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFICES ACT), ALAPPUZHA
10. P.A.HANSALAH MOHAMMED
SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT-I,
(SPECIAL COURT FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFICES ACT) PATHANAMTHITTA.
BY ADVS.SMT.BINDU K. NAIR SMT.K.P.SANTHI
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, HOME (C) DEPARMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2. THE STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, LAW (INSPECTION) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECREARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.B.JAYASURYA
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
05-04-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
RP.No. 260 of 2017 () IN WA.2264/2016 ---------------------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES:
RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A TO JUDGE
V.Chitambaresh & Sathish Ninan, JJ. ============================== R.P No.260 of 2017 in W.A No.2264 of 2016
==========================
Dated this the 05th day of April, 2017
ORDER
Chitambaresh, J
The review petition is dismissed.
Sd/- V.Chitambaresh, Judge
Sd/- Sathish Ninan, Judge
vdv
SAJU GEORGE et al.
STATE OF KERALA
V. CHITAMBARESH
SATHISH NINAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
